General Questions

QUESTION: What are we being asked to do?

The issue is: shall our local government continue to be provided by the County of Los Angeles and its five Supervisors, or should we be governed by the local City of Santa Clarita and its five City Councilmembers.

QUESTION: What is the history of county versus city government in the Santa Clarita Valley?

The Santa Clarita Valley has been trying to break away from the Los Angeles County government for decades. In the 1970’s, two attempts to form a completely new county were put on the ballot countywide. Comfortable majorities within the Santa Clarita Valley approved both county formation attempts. The rest of Los Angeles County refused to let Santa Clarita Valley become independent.

Several attempts to form cities occurred as early as the 1940’s.

Finally, after a titanic three-year battle, the City of Santa Clarita was created in 1987. In spite of a nearly $600,000 anti-incorporation campaign (in 1987 dollars), the voters approved the creation of the City of Santa Clarita by a nearly 70% majority.

QUESTION: Have any other communities tried to annex themselves into the City of Santa Clarita?

Yes. To-date, 28 other annexations have been proposed and ratified into the City of Santa Clarita.

QUESTION: Has the City of Santa Clarita actively promoted these other 28 annexations?


No. The city policy makes annexation somewhat challenging.

QUESTION: What is the process for getting any area, such as Stonecrest, annexed into the City? (Also See Map of Proposed Areas)

Before an actual annexation application is filed, the City asks that a minimum of 60% of the residents of a proposed annexation submit petition signatures supporting annexation to the City itself.

Once it has received this indication of 60% support, the City then submits a city annexation application to the government agency that regulates annexation. This state-charted agency is run by the County of Los Angeles, and is called the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO).

LAFCO does technical analysis about the accuracy of the annexation map, and verifies if the proposed annexation meets all the technical code requirements, which are very numerous.
LAFCO then issues a report about whether the proposed annexation has met all of the necessary technical requirements. If the technical requirements are met, LAFCO then establishes what is called a “protest hearing”.

At this protest hearing, residents of the proposed annexation have the opportunity to vote in favor or in opposition to the annexation. Being in favor of the annexation at this stage is very simple. If you would like the annexation to successfully conclude, you do noting. You don’t protest.

If you are still opposed to the annexation, however, you have the right to send a letter, or sign a petition of opposition to the annexation to LAFCO.
If 15% but less than 50% of the residents of the proposed annexation sign protest petitions, then the annexation is stalled.

Under this circumstance, a special election is called, paid for by the taxpayers to ask yet again whether all the people effected by annexation will approve or oppose.

If more than 50% of the registered voters turn in these “protest” letters or petitions, then the annexation is killed outright and proceeds no further.

In addition, no new annexation is allowed to be filed for a minimum of one year.
Over 85% of the residents of the older, first phase of Stonecrest (sometimes called “lower Stonecrest”) signed petitions in favor of annexation going back to the year 2002.

QUESTION: 28 annexations into the City of Santa Clarita have been ratified in the last 18 years. How many of those had protest petitions signed that killed the annexation outright?

Zero (none). The city policy makes annexation somewhat challenging.

QUESTION: How many of the 28 annexations ratified were forced to hold a special, taxpayer-funded election?

One.

QUESTION: What was the result of this one election?

The voters approved allowing the annexation to the City.

QUESTION: Which one of the 28 annexations had this election?


It was the area directly bordering Stonecrest commonly referred to as the “Pine Tree – Timberlane – Le House” neighborhood. This annexation stretched from just passed Sand Canyon Road northeast to the present boundary just northeast of Shadow Pines Boulevard. It brought nearly 6,000 residents into the City.

< Back to Community Concerns & FAQs


Home | Background | Taxes & Fees | City Vs. County Services | The Opposition | FAQs
E-Mail | Contact | Resources| Site Map

Join the E-Mail List